گردهمایی سالانه ویلپنت؛ هم استراتژیک و هم تاکتیک



مقاله ای از دکتر منشور وارسته عضو شورای ملی مقاومت ایران
جنبش مقاومت ایران هر سال یک گردهمایی بزرگ در پاریس برگزار می کند و دهها هزار نفر در این گردهمایی شرکت می کنند که شامل صدها شخصیت سیاسی از سراسر دنیا می باشد.
امسال این گردهمایی در شرایط ویژه ای برگزار میشود و آقای وارسته مقاله خود را به اهمیت استراتژیک و تاکتیکی این گردهمایی اختصاص داده است که ذیلا از نظر می گذرد:
در آستانه برگزاری گرد هم‌آیی سالیانه مقاومت سازمان‌یافته، اوّل ژوئیه ۲۰۱۷، در ویلپنت «پاریس» که مصادف است با سالگرد آغاز مقاومت مسلحانه، روز شهدا و زندانیان سیاسی و روز تأسیس ارتش آزادی‌بخش ملی، صاحب این قلم را بر آن داشت تا به اختصار اهمیت مشارکت همه هموطنان را در این روز تاریخی، چه در استراتژی و چه در تاکتیک، تشریح نماید.

کلید واژه ها: اقتدارگرایی، استبداد دینی، ولی‌فقیه، فرهنگ استبدادزده، بحران‌های داخلی و بین‌المللی، مقاومت سازمان‌یافته و گرد هم‌آیی ویلپنت.
Image may contain: 1 person, smiling, text
وضعیت داخلی رژیم استبداد دینی:
آخوندهای حاکم، با تاکتیک چپاول و غارت و نابودی اشرافیت گذشته از یک‌سو و با برقراری اختناق و سرکوب و شانتاژ و گروگانگیری و تروریسم، چه در صحنه داخلی و چه خارجی؛ از سوی دیگر، قدرت خود را بر تمام آحاد مملکت تحمیل و در پی آن حاکمیت قرون‌وسطایی خاص خود را که برآمده از اعماق جهل تاریخ بود، پدید آورند. از ویژگی نظام الیگارشی دینی استعداد بی پایان آن در کنارگذاشتن هر انسان شایسته‌ای و جذب هر عنصری که در خدمت منافع حاکمیت سرسپرده است می‌باشد. متناسب با دور و یا نزدیک بودن فرد به منابع قدرت در نظام، یا هیچ کاره یا همه کاره و در جمع نخبگان نظام قرار می‌گیرد.

«ترقه بازی» داعش در تهران واقعی یا سفارشی و نمایشی ؟!

Image may contain: one or more people and textدر پی ائتلاف بزرگ بین‌المللی شامل کشورهای عربی - اسلامی و آمریکا علیه جنگ‌افروزی و تروریسم رژیم  ایران سلسله ای از عملیات تروریستی در منچسترو بغدادو کابل مصر و لندن  اتفاق افتاد.
فرمانده پیشین سپاه پاسداران رژیم ایران محسن رضایی در این رابطه گفت:انفجار تروریستی در منچستر انگلیس حاصل رقص با شمشیر ترامپ با رییس تروریست هاست. همچنین موضعگیری امیر قطر در حمایت از رژیم ایران با واکنش شدید کشورهای عربی روبرو گردید و منجر به قطع روابط دیپلماتیک و تجاری آنها با این کشور شد.
داعش که در طول موجودیتش هیچ اقدامی علیه  رژیم ایران نکرده بود ناگهان  به‌نحو غیرمترقبه  ای در  روز  چهارشنبه  ۷ ژوئن در تهران و در امنیتی ترین مراکز رژیم اقدام به حمله مسلحانه به مجلس رژیم ایران و بمب گذاری بر سر قبر خمینی نمود.
با توجه به سابقه این رژیم از جمله انفجار حرم امام رضا و نسبت دادن آن به مخالفین خود برای مردم ایران بسیار دشوار است که حرف ها و ادعاهای این رژیم را باور کنند وبا دیده شک و تردید به این خبر نگریستند و برایشان  باور نکردنی بود که این کار داعش بوده باشد. آنها در فضای مجازی بلافاصله انگشت اتهام را به سوی خود رژیم بردند و اینکه آیا این یک نمایش  و اقدامی ساختگی  و یا  سفارشی است یا نه آنچه که دستگاههای خبر رسانی رژیم ایران می گویند صحت دارد؟!

ANALYSIS: Was ISIS ‘firecrackers game’ in Tehran real or customized?


A series of terrorist attacks targeted Manchester, Kabul, Egypt, Baghdad and London recently. Mohsen Rezaee, the former commander of the Iranian regime’s Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) said that “Manchester Bombing Result of Trump’s Dance with Chief of Terrorists”.

Meanwhile, the position of Emir of Qatar towards international coalition in the favour of Iranian regime has met with a harsh response from several Arab countries and has led to the severing of diplomatic and trade relations with this country.

On June 7, 2017, ISIS that had nothing to do with Iranian regime for many years, suddenly appeared in Tehran and carried out armed attacks to regime’s parliament building and bombing in the Khomeini tomb, although they are the most secure centres.

Due to the many examples of the same scenarios made by the regime in the past, such as Emam Reza blast and accusation of the opposition groups, Iranian people hardly can believe the regime claims that this is an ISIS attack.

Did Khamenei gamble big by playing the Raisi card?


Did Khamenei fail to manipulate this election by selecting Ebrahim Raisi as his favorite president
Did Khamenei fail to manipulate this election by selecting Ebrahim Raisi as his favorite president? (AFP)Wednesday, 24 May 2017 

There is no doubt that what is known as “presidential election” in Iran is held in a very oppressive atmosphere. It is fake and totally different from democratic elections held around .the world

In this fake show, only two candidates out of a total of six, are approved by Guardian Council (which is a council consisting of members selected by Khamenei).

The two main selected candidates are given full media attention and coverage and political analysts turn them into election highlights. This is to divert the people’s attention away from the regime’s internal tussle for power.

It is also to cover up the regime’s continuing torture, oppression, executions and total mismanagement of social, political and economic issues that are effecting the people on a daily basis.

The objective of holding this type of “election show” - under the absolute dictatorship is to create an interior balance in the ruling system and achieve an international legitimacy in order to justify trades with western powers and politicians who are willing to shake the hands of delegates of illegitimate Iranian regime.

Closing their eyes on the regime’s past records of human rights, terrorism and the main factor of the Middle East instability. However, few questions remain unanswered. Did Khamenei fail to manipulate this election by selecting Ebrahim Raisi as his favorite president?

Both sides are sharing news of widespread fraud in this election. Several clashes have led to the death of three persons while another 50 have been injured in Khorasan province. As many as 300 have been arrested in relation to election frauds. Nevertheless, two different views exist.

Bringing Raisi who was known as one of the notorious judges of the 1988 massacre, whose decision to execute of thousands of innocent people did not take more than a few minutes in each hearing .Who had also no political experience in running the country political, social and economic issues.

Was this a reason to frighten the people to participate in the sham election against him by choosing the other candidate? This view is not true because it could mean an obvious defeat for Khamenei.

Another view is that Khamenei had two options of minimum and maximum choices. Through the maximum option, he was aiming to close the interior political gaps of his regime and create a seamless system, also resolve the challenge of introducing his successor by selecting Ebrahim Raisi.

The minimum option pertained to selecting Hassan Rouhani due to the potential that exists among Iranian public and his fear of another massive uprising even wider and deeper than what happened in 2009. Additionally; his isolation in the region and worldwide and possible future sanctions, which are seriously dangerous nightmares for his regime.

Ebrahim Raisi gestures after casting his ballot for the presidential elections in southern Tehran on May 19, 2017. (AFP)

Khamenei’s defeat?
Rouhani’s victory highlights the defeat of Khamenei and Revolutionary Guard in controlling the result of the sham election in the way it was initially designed for. Khamenei gambled by playing the Raisi card. He could not bring his agent to power to deal with crises that have surrounded his regime.

This is a serious defeat for him. It will weaken his position more than before and deepen the regime’s internal conflicts, especially at the Khamenei side.

Khamenei, in his message after the final results, did not congratulate Hasan Rouhani, which shows his serious shame and defeat.

In an interview with Radio Farda Mohammad Mohaddessin, Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, said: “Presidential elections in Iran are not same as elections in the US or Europe. In Iranian regime, everything is controlled by the Supreme Leader and president should obey supreme leader and his constitution with no authority by himself”.

Mohamad Mohadesin in an article in Forbes magazine wrote: “Since its foundation, the clerical regime ruling Iran has used false elections to paint a democratic picture of its tyrannical rule across the world. Unfortunately, for different motives, some western politicians and governments acknowledge this and try to invest in the power-jockeying between the so-called “moderate” and “hardliner” factions in the Iranian regime, a competition they deem authentic”.

“If not stemming from economic interests and political considerations, this logic is rooted in a flawed assessment of the structure governing the religious dictatorship ruling Iran. This erroneous line of thinking and the decisions it has resulted in have come at a huge cost to peace and stability in the region and across the globe”.

CNN reporter Lisa Daftari said that if you talk to the critics of the regime whether they are expelled or inside the country they would tell you this is entirely a sham election, a fake election, a fake system, because all of the candidates have to be approved by the council, all of the candidates come from within the system.

“So, whether Rouhani is a bit more reformist, it is all within the same system. They are going to be made up within the same cult which is the cult of the Islamic Republic of that government. I have been hearing a lot and trying to pull out these interviews with Iranians who still are talking about regime change or pushing and finding the ways of exposing the regime for real problems within the society and again the crack down on the journalists, on dancers, on writers, on bloggers …people are going to prison for a Facebook post.”

‘The Arab Spring’
The CNN reporter added: “The change was started with Arab Spring, and while Iran is not an Arab nation Iran actually was prospector to the Arab Spring in 2009 when the young people of Iran came out on to the street they wanted to tell the world we overcome government and we want something different.”

Rouhani in February of 2015, confessed that his government mullahs had used their presence in Syria and Iraq as a bargaining tool during the nuclear deal. He said: “If our forces were not been in Baghdad, Samera, Folujeh, and Ramady, and if they had not supported Assad regime, they could not have security to make a good nuclear deal”.

He also confessed during the election debates that the ruling system in past 38 years “only was busy for executions and imprisonments”. But when Khamenei came to the public and threatened Rouhani that “he will be slapped”, he quickly changed his direction and said that “he can kiss the hands of supreme leader ten times”!

Despite the scientific and technological progress, the human being has not discovered an instrument to measure lies and bawdiness yet. However, it seems completely impossible that we can invent an equipment to find out the degree of lies and bawdiness of ruling mullahs in Iran!

They are masters that are teaching evil. Iranian people have made a joke that once Khomeini came to the power, evil has lost his job and now is looking for employment! Actually, evil cannot work as satanic as mullahs any more!

Hasan Rouhani while accused his rivals for executions and imprisonments in past 38 years, had been the first person that requested the execution of opponent people in the public.

Moreover, he was the first person that banned the entrance of thousands of women in offices without 
Hijab, and forced them to stay at home.
:This article has been published in 


Did Miscalculations generated crisis and instability in the Middle East?!





"Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it." George Santayana

   Persian Empire the largest empire in the world at its time of ruling, and when the slavery was a custom, was the land of abolished slavery! Moreover, the Iranian nation under ruling of Cyrus the great introduced the first declaration of human rights for the world history. Cyrus the Great's Cylinder is the first charter of right of nations in the world. It is a baked-clay cylinder in Akkadian language with cuneiforms script. 


Iran the great nation of first human right deceleration has been striving for justice, freedom and democracy and establishment of human rights after Cyrus the great since 2500 BC, to the present. 
This more than a century of historical struggle coincides between three different social political forces. 
We have witnessed these three elements during Iran's constitutional revolution and naturalization of petroleum and oil under the leadership of Dr. Mohammad Mosadegh and to the Iran's  revolution of 1979, which includes the following elements:
First,The resistance forces rooting by people's support which struggles for freedom and democracy and seeking for the betterment of human rights relaying on establishment of rule of law and a constitution by the people and for the people based on a popular electoral process. 
Secondly,Theelement of Puppet government which is affiliated with foreign countries and have no grass root from people. This element gets its power by the support of foreign governments. The latest example of such, is dictatorship of Pahlavi's Monarchy under Mohamad Reza Shah which was toppled by people's revolution. 

انتخابات در ايران هيچ شباهتي به انتخابات ندارد



در بريتانيا بر سر ماندن يا خروج از اتحاديه اروپا يك  همه پرسي  برگزار شد. برآمد اين همه پرسي جامعه بريتانيا را به دو بخش تقسيم نمود. با اينكه فاصله زيادي بين مخالفين و موافقين نبود و گروهي از مردم هم ابراز پشيماني مي كردند از اينكه راي به خروج از اتحاديه اروپا داده اند اما دولت بريتانيا و دولت هاي عضو اتحاديه اروپا به تصميم اكثريت جامعه بريتانيا گردن نهادند و اين يعني احترام به دمكراسي.
اكنون ما شاهد تصميم نخست وزير بريتانيا براي برگزاري يك انتخابات زود رس هستيم و مردم بريتانيا آزادانه نمايندگان خود را انتخاب مي كنند. همه احزاب حتي دست راستي ترين هم در اين انتخابات شركت مي كنند. ما شاهد اين روش در فرانسه نيز هستيم و ژان ماري لوپن رهبر يك حزب دست راستي به دور دوم انتخابات رياست جمهوري فرانسه راه پيدا كرده است. مردم سرخورده و مايوس از سياست هاي گوليست هاي راست و سوسياليست هاي چپ ميانه به گزينه هايي روي آورده اند كه نشانگر دو قطبي شدن جامعه اين كشور و شكست احزاب شناخته شده است. افزون بر بيكاري و فقر و وضعيت بد اقتصادي  احساس نا امني بخش زيادي از  جامعه در برابر بنيادگرايي و تروريسم را هم بايد ديد. با دست راست ريش ملاهاي تهران را نوازش كردن و با دست چپ اسلحه حمل كردن براي مقابله با تروريستهايي كه محصول دخالت ملاهاي تهران در سوريه و عراق ولبنان و يمن و افغانستان و ... است سياستي نابخردانه  زيانبار و ورشكسته است.
 در انتخابات بريتانيا و فرانسه راي مردم است كه تعيين مي كند  چه كسي به شماره ده داونين استريت يا كاخ اليزه راه پيدا مي كند  نه يك شوراي نگهبان مانند انتخابات قلابي در حكومت ملاههاي ايران.
چيزي كه ما اين روزها شاهد آن هستيم و هيچ شباهتي به انتخابات در هيچكدام از كشورهاي دنيا را ندارد 
يك ايراني در شبكه اجتماعي فيسبوك  در ارتباط با رد صلاحيت كانديداها و از جمله محمود احمدي نژاد كه هشت سال رئيس جمهور اين رژيم و  به گفته خامنه اي  نظراتش به او خيلي نزديك بوده! يك نامه سرگشاده و طنز خطاب به شوراي نگهبان ملاها نوشته است كه بسيار خواندني است و مورد توجه و تاييد كاربران اين شبكه اجتماعي قرار گرفته است.
اين ايراني مي نويسد: آقاي شوراي نگهبان سلام, شما كه زحمت كشيديد و يك روزه از بين بيش از 1800 كانديدا شش نفر را انتخاب كرديد, زحمت ادامه كار را هم بكشيد و كانديد مورد نظر آقاي خامنه اي را هم خودتان انتخاب مي كرديد, كه هم هزينه كمتري داشته باشد و هم نگراني هاي نظام بر سر كنترل مناظره ها و  احتمال بهره برداري جامعه ناراضي و تكرار اعتراض هاي اجتماعي سال 2008  بر طرف شود!
يعني يك نمايش كاملا قلابي در جريان است. اما اجراي همين نمايش قلابي هم براي حكومت ايران ساده نيست. يكي از كانديداهاي مورد تاييد خامنه اي و شوراي نگهبان ابراهيم رئيسي است كه در كشتار هزاران زنداني سياسي دست داشته و از اعضاي هيات مرگ بوده است. در اين رابطه مدتي پيش احمد منتظري فرزند آيت الله منتظري جانشين وقت خميني يك فايل صوتي منتشر كرد و به بخاطر انتشار اين فايل صوتي از سوي دادگاه مورد بازخواست و محاكمه قرار گرفت.
در اين فايل صوتي آقاي منتظري خطاب به اعضاي هيات مرگ كه ابراهيم رئيسي و  پور محمدي وزير دادگستري دولت حسن روحاني دو تن از اعضاي آن بودند مي گويد :  نام شما را به عنوان جنايتكار در تاريخ مي نويسند و اين (اعدام زندانيان سياسي )بزرگترين جنايت تاريخ جمهوري اسلامي است.

Elections in Iran has no resemblance to the elections

Wednesday, 10 May 2017
   Al Arabiya English

In the United Kingdom, a referendum was held to decide whether to stay or withdraw from the European Union. The outcome of the referendum divided the British society.
Even though the gap between proponents and opponents was narrow, and a group of people expressed regret about the verdict, the British government and EU member-states accepted the result, which amounts to showing respect for democracy.
No automatic alt text available.Now, the British Prime Minister has decided to hold an early election in which British people will choose their representatives. All the parties, even the extreme right-wing, will take part in this election.
We also observed Jean-Marie Le Pen, leader of a right-wing party, reaching the second round of elections in France. People who are disillusioned and disappointed with the policies of Gaulish right and centre-left socialists have turned to alternatives that reflect the polarization of the society, which shows the defeat of the established parties.
In addition to unemployment and poverty, insecurity and economic hardship, the majority of people in France also feels the effects of fundamentalism and terrorism.
The Iran parallel
In total contrast, the Mullahs of Tehran are misusing religion to send terror to Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen and Afghanistan in what is widely described as an ill-advised and bankrupted policy.
In the British and French elections, the votes of people will determine who enters 10 Downing Street or the Elyse presidential palace. However, in Iran Guardian Council of mullahs chooses the president through a sham election. What we are witnessing these days has no resemblance to the elections in any other country in the world.